On 3/21/21 1:15 PM, Jan Wieck wrote:
> On 3/21/21 12:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> writes:
>>> On 3/20/21 12:39 AM, Jan Wieck wrote:
>>>> On the way pg_upgrade also mangles the pg_database.datdba
>>>> (all databases are owned by postgres after an upgrade; will submit a
>>>> separate patch for that as I consider that a bug by itself).
>>
>>> Patch attached.
>>
>> Hmm, doesn't this lose all *other* database-level properties?
>>
>> I think maybe what we have here is a bug in pg_restore, its
>> --create switch ought to be trying to update the database's
>> ownership.
>
> Possibly. I didn't look into that route.
Thanks for that. I like this patch a lot better.
Regards, Jan
--
Jan Wieck
Principle Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services
