On 3/21/21 12:57 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info> writes:
>> On 3/20/21 12:39 AM, Jan Wieck wrote:
>>> On the way pg_upgrade also mangles the pg_database.datdba
>>> (all databases are owned by postgres after an upgrade; will submit a
>>> separate patch for that as I consider that a bug by itself).
>
>> Patch attached.
>
> Hmm, doesn't this lose all *other* database-level properties?
>
> I think maybe what we have here is a bug in pg_restore, its
> --create switch ought to be trying to update the database's
> ownership.
Possibly. I didn't look into that route.
Regards, Jan
--
Jan Wieck
Principle Database Engineer
Amazon Web Services
