Re: Are SQL functions better than PG/SQL ones? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Vitaly Belman
Subject Re: Are SQL functions better than PG/SQL ones?
Date
Msg-id fa96e3c604071702147709654a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Are SQL functions better than PG/SQL ones?  ("Vitaly Belman" <vitalyb@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
I see. I'll redirect the question there then. Thanks.

On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 23:32:13 -0500, mike g <mike@thegodshalls.com> wrote:
> Have you run the analyze function on the table or database?
>
> We would need to see the sql for your tests to determine why it was or
> was not used.
>
> By the way the pgsql-performance list is probably a much better place to
> discuss this.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sat, 2004-07-10 at 05:57, Vitaly Belman wrote:
> > I ready somewhere that PostgreSQL is able to optimize SQL functions,
> > the same way it does with views. For example if you do:
> >
> > select * from cv_customers() order by customer_id;
> >
> > When customers is an SQL function the optimizer/planner will be able to
> > actually use the customer_id index.
> >
> > >From some tests I made it doesn't seem true.. Yet I am asking to know
> > for sure.
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> > TIP 7: don't forget to increase your free space map settings
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
>
>                http://archives.postgresql.org
>
>


--
 ICQ: 1912453
 AIM: VitalyB1984
 MSN: tmdagent@hotmail.com
 Yahoo!: VitalyBe

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: joseph speigle
Date:
Subject: Re: PL/pgSQL Cookbook
Next
From: "Robert E. Bruccoleri"
Date:
Subject: Re: installation: cc and gcc how to?