On Wed, 2023-03-29 at 14:23 +0000, Sebastien Flaesch wrote:
> From: Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>
> > It is safe to assume that the CTID is stable within a single transaction
> > only if you use REPEATABLE READ or better transaction isolation level.
> >
> > With READ COMMITTED, you see updated rows (and consequently changed CTID)
> > within a single transaction. And if you use SELECT ... FOR UPDATE, you
> > could even see a changed CTID within a single statement.
> >
> > So don't use CTID to identify rows unless you use REPEATABLE READ or better.
>
> Thanks for the advice about REPEATABLE READ isolation level!
... but that is only useful in a read-only scenario.
If you try to UPDATE the row in a REPEATABLE READ transaction, you
will get a serialization error if there was a concurrent update.
In short: don't use the CTID to identify a row.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
