Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Radosław Smogura
Subject Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files
Date
Msg-id f8294e788aa168e7257654e71a502b29@mail.softperience.eu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Responses Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 14:12:59 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 12:34, Radosław Smogura
> <rsmogura@softperience.eu> wrote:
>> After compilation I got big list of differences about binaries and 
>> other
>> files. You may see it in patch.
>
> Hmm. Does this really affect just cygwin, and not also mingw? I know
> msvc builds out-of-tree, but mingw doesn't, iirc? WHere do the EXEs 
> go
> there?
Actually I called compilation from make in cygwin env, as I can't run build on Windows7/VisualStudio 2010. I don't know
ifthis is preferred method.
 
From configure script
checking for ld used by GCC... /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exechecking if the linker (/usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ld.exe) is
GNUld... yes
 
CC runs asGNU C (GCC) version 4.3.4 20090804 (release) 1 (i686-pc-cygwin)        compiled by GNU C version 4.3.4
20090804(release) 1, GMP version 4.3.1, MPFR version 2.4.1-p5.GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=100 --param
ggc-min-heapsize=131072
After compilation I got many of *dll.def and others.

>
> What's "nbproject"?Just configuration from some editor. It looks like any move in project creates this entry in
.gitignore

> As for the patch itself, we don't normally keep comments in the
> .gitignore files, I'm not sure if we want to start doing that...This is not my part - just wanted to comment what and
why.
Regards,Radek


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Pavan Deolasee
Date:
Subject: Re: reducing the overhead of frequent table locks - now, with WIP patch
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: .gitignore for some of cygwin files