On 12/10/24 21:22, Adrian Klaver wrote:
> On 12/10/24 19:05, PopeRigby wrote:
>> On 12/9/24 16:31, Adrian Klaver wrote:
>>> On 12/9/24 15:30, PopeRigby wrote:
>>>> On 12/9/24 15:23, Tom Lane wrote:
>>>>> Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes:
>>>>>> You could file an issue here:
>>>>>> https://www.postgresql.org/account/login/?next=/account/submitbug/
>>>>>> Ask if the developers could use the mechanisms available here:
>>>>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/extend-extensions.html#EXTEND-EXTENSIONS-RELOCATION
>>>>>>
>>>>> This wouldn't really move the needle, since (a) there is not some
>>>>> magic group of people that will become involved who aren't already
>>>>> and (b) the requested fix seems exactly the same as the work
>>>>> already in progress at [1].
>>>>>
>>>>> What would help is to figure out why the proposed patch didn't
>>>>> seem to work for you. I continue to suspect that you didn't
>>>>> really install the updated extension, but it's unclear.
>>>>>
>>>>> regards, tom lane
>>>>>
>>>>> [1]
>>>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3395418.1618352794@sss.pgh.pa.us
>>>>
>>>> I compiled and installed PostgreSQL with the patch, and restarted
>>>> it, so unless there are other steps I'm not sure what I could have
>>>> done wrong.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What was the source of the patch?
>>>
>> This:
>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/attachment/122092/0002-earthdistance-sql-functions.patch
>>
>
> If I am following correctly I believe you need this one:
>
>
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/attachment/166859/v2-0002-Use-new-style-SQL-function-in-earthdistance-exten.patch
>
>
> It has the changes that include the schema qualifications. The one you
> used does not have those modifications.
>
Beautiful. How can I follow this so I know when it gets upstream?
