On 12/10/24 19:05, PopeRigby wrote: > On 12/9/24 16:31, Adrian Klaver wrote: >> On 12/9/24 15:30, PopeRigby wrote: >>> On 12/9/24 15:23, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> Adrian Klaver <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com> writes: >>>>> You could file an issue here: >>>>> https://www.postgresql.org/account/login/?next=/account/submitbug/ >>>>> Ask if the developers could use the mechanisms available here: >>>>> https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/extend-extensions.html#EXTEND-EXTENSIONS-RELOCATION >>>> This wouldn't really move the needle, since (a) there is not some >>>> magic group of people that will become involved who aren't already >>>> and (b) the requested fix seems exactly the same as the work >>>> already in progress at [1]. >>>> >>>> What would help is to figure out why the proposed patch didn't >>>> seem to work for you. I continue to suspect that you didn't >>>> really install the updated extension, but it's unclear. >>>> >>>> regards, tom lane >>>> >>>> [1] >>>> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/3395418.1618352794@sss.pgh.pa.us >>> >>> I compiled and installed PostgreSQL with the patch, and restarted it, >>> so unless there are other steps I'm not sure what I could have done >>> wrong. >>> >> >> >> What was the source of the patch? >> > This: > https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/attachment/122092/0002-earthdistance-sql-functions.patch > If I am following correctly I believe you need this one: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/attachment/166859/v2-0002-Use-new-style-SQL-function-in-earthdistance-exten.patch It has the changes that include the schema qualifications. The one you used does not have those modifications. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
pgsql-general by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных
