On Wed, 2022-12-14 at 12:07 +0300, Pavel Luzanov wrote:
> After a fresh install, including the patch for \dpS [1],
> I found that granting MAINTAIN privilege does not allow the TOAST
> table
> to be vacuumed.
I wanted to also mention partitioning. The behavior is that MAINTAIN
privileges on the partitioned table does not imply MAINTAIN privileges
on the partitions. I believe that's fine and it's consistent with other
privileges on partitioned tables, such as SELECT and INSERT. In the
case of an admin maintaining users' tables, they'd be a member of
pg_maintain anyway.
Furthermore, MAINTAIN privileges on the partitioned table do not grant
the ability to create new partitions. There's a comment in tablecmds.c
alluding to a possible "UNDER" privilege:
/*
* We should have an UNDER permission flag for this, but for now,
* demand that creator of a child table own the parent.
*/
Perhaps there's something we want to do there, but it's a different use
case than the MAINTAIN privilege, so I don't see a reason it should be
grouped. Also, there's a bit of weirdness to think about in cases where
another user creates (and owns) a partition of your table (currently
this is only possible if the other user is a superuser).
I am not suggesting a change here, just posting in case someone has a
different opinion.
--
Jeff Davis
PostgreSQL Contributor Team - AWS
