Re: PostgreSQL vs MariaDB - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Thomas Guyot |
---|---|
Subject | Re: PostgreSQL vs MariaDB |
Date | |
Msg-id | f1180cf2-848f-1bfc-bbb9-b3966d07fc08@gmail.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | PostgreSQL vs MariaDB (Inzamam Shafiq <inzamam.shafiq@hotmail.com>) |
Responses |
Re: PostgreSQL vs MariaDB
|
List | pgsql-general |
On 2023-03-24 07:07, Inzamam Shafiq wrote: > Hi Team, > > Hope you are doing well. > > Can someone please list pros and cons of MariaDB vs PostgreSQL that > actually needs serious consideration while choosing the right database > for large OLTP DBs (Terabytes)? > > Hi Inzamam, I will have my take as well, but note I have much more experience with MySQL/MariaDB and mostly from 10 years ago (although I did use both in the last decade too, mostly for hobby and a bit of PostgreSQL at work, and I have both running on my workstation). First of all unless you plan on licensing Oracle for MySQL support, you should probably go with MariaDB (which is what you seem to consider already). I've known and used MySQL before the MariaDB fork (and even before Sun's acquisition), and MariaDB is still heavily developed with open bug trackers and many 3rd party companies specializing in MySQL/MariaDB support. Having a sysadmin background, I find MariaDB to be easier to understand and administer as a server application. In the main engines, tables are straight up files on disk (for InnoDB which is now the default engine, a file-per-table option also makes this possible). There isn't really a concept of tablespaces, OTOH you can just move some files and symlink them (while the DB is down of course) to get some tables onto bigger or faster disks. Recent versions of InnoDB (shortly after the MariaDB fork at least) have had a lot of scalability and instrumentation improvement (a lot of it from Percona's XtraDB fork), and also allow you to further separate the common data files such as using separate files for the doublewrite buffer and redo logs (write-only except during crash recovery; perfect for spinning disks) from other read/write data files (containing undo logs and system tables amongst others, and table data when not using file-per-table). There's obviously the plugable engines (it appears PostgreSQL is implementing this too now), I'm less familiar with the latest development of those and have mostly used InnoDB/XtraDB but there's quite a few very specialized engines too. One I find particularly interesting is MyRocks which is optimized for flash storage with compression and can do high performance bulk inserts from files. OTOH my experience with PostgreSQL is that it seems to have greater support for some SQL features and concepts, or at least used to. I'm not sufficiently SQLiterate to give many specifics but I remember seeing a few examples in the past, one was lack of sequences which appears to have been added about 5 years ago (before that one could use auto_increment keys to get similar functionality). From my perspective PostgreSQL appears to be more similar to other database engines when it comes to managing tablespaces, schemas, etc., that said I had only limited experience with using Oracle, Sybase, DB2 and MSSQL, and not really anything about managing tablespaces/schemas. Also unlike MariaDB, Postgresql can version DDL too (in InnoDB they cause an implicit commit and rollbacks are no longer possible for the transaction executing it). I feel there may also likely more edge cases that you may have to be aware for some specific operations with MariaDB (it's well documented too) esp. with replication... but maybe that's just me knowing it better, and it's mostly from 10y old experience (it tend to be getting better over time and I haven't worked on any replicated setup lately). So, TL;DR if you're a real DBA with experience with other commercial DB engines, I think you will find yourself more at ease with PostgreSQL, and it will likely be easier to port statements from other engines. Someone with a strong sysadmin background, will likely be more comfortable setting up and maintaining MariaDB, and some of its plugable engines may also be worth considering, but that really depend on the type of load and hardware you will be using. I know there's very good instrumentation to troubleshoot performance issues with MariaDB/InnoDB, something I'm absolutely not familiar with PostgreSQL... Regards, Thomas
pgsql-general by date: