Re: wrong comment in libpq.h - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: wrong comment in libpq.h
Date
Msg-id ecf4411b-0f71-45f8-8c5e-81bb07f55e3a@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: wrong comment in libpq.h  (David Zhang <david.zhang@highgo.ca>)
Responses Re: wrong comment in libpq.h
List pgsql-hackers
On 04.05.24 00:29, David Zhang wrote:
> On 2024-05-03 4:53 a.m., Daniel Gustafsson wrote:
>>> On 3 May 2024, at 13:48, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> wrote:
>>> Maybe it's easier if we just replaced
>>>
>>>     prototypes for functions in xxx.c
>>>
>>> with
>>>
>>>     declarations for xxx.c
>>>
>>> throughout src/include/libpq/libpq.h.
>> +1
> +1

It looks like this wording "prototypes for functions in" is used many 
times in src/include/, in many cases equally inaccurately, so I would 
suggest creating a more comprehensive patch for this.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: TerminateOtherDBBackends code comments inconsistency.
Next
From: Alexander Korotkov
Date:
Subject: Re: psql: fix variable existence tab completion