pid_t on mingw - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject pid_t on mingw
Date
Msg-id e9b1a94d-45d6-f05f-efb7-b03ee23cd4a7@enterprisedb.com
Whole thread Raw
Responses clean up pid_t printing and get rid of pgpid_t
List pgsql-hackers
I wanted to propose the attached patch to get rid of the custom pgpid_t 
typedef in pg_ctl.  Since we liberally use pid_t elsewhere, this seemed 
plausible.

However, this patch fails the CompilerWarnings job on Cirrus, because 
apparently under mingw, pid_t is "volatile long long int", so all the 
printf placeholders mismatch.  However, we print pid_t as %d in a lot of 
other places, so I'm confused why this fails here.

Also, googling around a bit about this, it seems that mingw might have 
changed the pid_t from long long int to int some time ago.  Maybe that's 
how the pgpid_t came about to begin with.  The Cirrus job uses a 
cross-compilation environment.  I wonder how up to date that is compared 
to say the native mingw installations used on the build farm.

Any clues?
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: installcheck-world concurrency issues
Next
From: Peter Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix some newly modified tab-complete changes