Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Drouvot, Bertrand
Subject Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros
Date
Msg-id e5919fa9-c82d-a6e2-eb20-7f84d5b669d6@gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros  (Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Generate pg_stat_get_* functions with Macros
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On 12/3/22 1:51 AM, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Overall, this change looks straightforward, and it saves a couple hundred
> lines.
> 

Thanks for looking at it!

> On Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:09:22AM +0100, Drouvot, Bertrand wrote:
>> +/* pg_stat_get_numscans */
>> +PGSTAT_DEFINE_REL_INT64_FIELD_ACCESSOR(pg_stat_get_, numscans);
>> +
>> +/* pg_stat_get_tuples_returned */
>> +PGSTAT_DEFINE_REL_INT64_FIELD_ACCESSOR(pg_stat_get_, tuples_returned);
>> +
>> +/* pg_stat_get_tuples_fetched */
>> +PGSTAT_DEFINE_REL_INT64_FIELD_ACCESSOR(pg_stat_get_, tuples_fetched);
> 
> Can we hard-code the prefix in the macro?  It looks like all of these use
> the same one.
> 

Good point! Done in V2 attached.

Regards,

-- 
Bertrand Drouvot
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nikolay Samokhvalov
Date:
Subject: Re: Transaction timeout
Next
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: Avoid streaming the transaction which are skipped (in corner cases)