Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date
Msg-id e57c3a1d-f0c6-fc95-f405-0a109fecf214@lab.ntt.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Re: Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Maksim Milyutin <m.milyutin@postgrespro.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2017/03/23 23:47, Amit Langote wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Maksim Milyutin
> <m.milyutin@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have noticed that there is scheduled unlinking of nonexistent physical
>> storage under partitioned table when we execute DROP TABLE statement on this
>> partitioned table. Though this action doesn't generate any error under
>> typical behavior of postgres because the error of storage's lack is caught
>> through if-statement [1] I think it is not safe.
>>
>> My patch fixes this issue.
>>
>> 1. src/backend/storage/smgr/md.c:1385
> 
> Good catch, will incorporate that in the main patch.

And here is the updated patch.

Thanks,
Amit

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4
Next
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] WIP: Faster Expression Processing v4