Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Amit Langote
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode
Date
Msg-id CA+HiwqFXHagtVj2xPrrTs_0ncpTsWR6SSy6sUQyMFDG0qJuW1A@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Maksim Milyutin <m.milyutin@postgrespro.ru>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Partitioned tables and relfilenode  (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Maksim Milyutin
<m.milyutin@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I have noticed that there is scheduled unlinking of nonexistent physical
> storage under partitioned table when we execute DROP TABLE statement on this
> partitioned table. Though this action doesn't generate any error under
> typical behavior of postgres because the error of storage's lack is caught
> through if-statement [1] I think it is not safe.
>
> My patch fixes this issue.
>
> 1. src/backend/storage/smgr/md.c:1385

Good catch, will incorporate that in the main patch.

Thanks,
Amit



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: [HACKERS] Schedule and Release Management Team for PG10
Next
From: Jesper Pedersen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Page Scan Mode in Hash Index