Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets
Date
Msg-id e2394d91-d857-f76e-bfa6-250eb79801d6@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2020-11-24 02:57, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:06:43PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I think we are getting a bit sidetracked here with the message wording. The
>> reason I looked at this was that "remove socket file and retry" is never an
>> appropriate action with abstract sockets.  And on further analysis, it is
>> never an appropriate action with any Unix-domain socket (because with file
>> system namespace sockets, you never get an EADDRINUSE, so it's dead code).
>> So my proposal here is to just delete that line from the hint and leave the
>> rest the same.
> 
> Reading again this thread, +1 on that.

committed, thanks

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
2ndQuadrant, an EDB company
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Luc Vlaming
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel plans and "union all" subquery
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets