Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Michael Paquier
Subject Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets
Date
Msg-id 20201124015740.GC3046@paquier.xyz
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: abstract Unix-domain sockets  (Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 04:06:43PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> I think we are getting a bit sidetracked here with the message wording. The
> reason I looked at this was that "remove socket file and retry" is never an
> appropriate action with abstract sockets.  And on further analysis, it is
> never an appropriate action with any Unix-domain socket (because with file
> system namespace sockets, you never get an EADDRINUSE, so it's dead code).
> So my proposal here is to just delete that line from the hint and leave the
> rest the same.

Reading again this thread, +1 on that.
--
Michael

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Online verification of checksums
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: "as quickly as possible" (was: remove spurious CREATE INDEX CONCURRENTLY wait)