That doesn't really help anwser the question...
The developers in our office (and myself) are also under the impression that
PG is a very slow database.
Also when you look thru the "performance" newsgroup, it seems to me that
what people are saying is true.
So instead of being a jerk to those of us who are a "novice" to PG, how
about giving some concrete answers to these performance questions.
> ebcorder@rockwellcollins.com wrote:
>>
>> I know when comparison tests are performed they can be tilted on these
>> internet sites. But I see so many people declaring PostgreSQL to be the
>> slowest I am thinking where there is smoke there's fire.
"Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> wrote in message
news:200604090338.k393c8G09848@candle.pha.pa.us...
>
> Lots of people still think Elvis is alive. :-)
>
> --
> Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
>
