On 7/7/24 07:53, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>
> ne 7. 7. 2024 v 16:48 odesílatel Adrian Klaver
> <adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>> napsal:
>
> On 7/7/24 07:42, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> > I'm not sure why there's a warning about using an alias.
> 43.3.1 says
> > to use them for improved readability.
> >
> >
> > it is obsolete - aliases were used when Postgres doesn't support
> named
> > arguments.
>
> Is that was what it was complaining about or the fact they where
> declared and never used?
>
>
> I am not sure if I understand the question. My reply was related to
> generic usage of aliases.
The conversation was:
Mike Nolan
"I'm not sure why there's a warning about using an alias. 43.3.1 says
to use them for improved readability."
Pavel Stehule
"it is obsolete - aliases were used when Postgres doesn't support named
arguments."
I was just trying to confirm that the warning was not for ALIAS being
declared. That it was for what you state below.
>
> Report from plpgsql_check was correct - and related variables were not
> used.
>
>
> >
> > I don't know any good reason why one variable can use more than
> one name.
>
> Section 43.3.2. ALIAS provides the pros/cons.
>
> >
> > There can be an exception when argument names are very long, but
> > generally they are not used.
> >
> >
> >
> > Mike Nolan
> >
>
> --
> Adrian Klaver
> adrian.klaver@aklaver.com <mailto:adrian.klaver@aklaver.com>
>
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
