Re: [ psql - review request ] review request for \d+ tablename, \d+ indexname indenting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [ psql - review request ] review request for \d+ tablename, \d+ indexname indenting
Date
Msg-id e08ddb6f-ac12-33d9-a932-f4f13a0d7899@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ psql - review request ] review request for \d+ tablename, \d+ indexname indenting  (쿼리트릭스 <querytricks2023@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [ psql - review request ] review request for \d+ tablename, \d+ indexname indenting
List pgsql-hackers
On 12.09.23 09:27, 쿼리트릭스 wrote:
> Thank you for letting me know more about the test method.
> As you said, we applied the patch using git diff and created a test case 
> on the src/test/regress/sql.

Because of the change of the psql output, a lot of existing test cases 
are now failing.  You should run "make check" and fix up the failures. 
Also, your new test file "subpartition_indentation" isn't actually run 
because it was not added to src/test/regress/parallel_schedule.  I 
suspect you probably don't want to add a new test file for this but 
instead see if the existing tests cover this case.




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Daniel Gustafsson
Date:
Subject: Re: Redundant Unique plan node for table with a unique index
Next
From: "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)"
Date:
Subject: RE: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node