Re: [ psql - review request ] review request for \d+ tablename, \d+ indexname indenting - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From 쿼리트릭스
Subject Re: [ psql - review request ] review request for \d+ tablename, \d+ indexname indenting
Date
Msg-id CAO5pyYMnKuKhe++atnQM2w6S5B_rTYeK0ooM0+3jrCzV5gNrvw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ psql - review request ] review request for \d+ tablename, \d+ indexname indenting  (Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>)
Responses Re: [ psql - review request ] review request for \d+ tablename, \d+ indexname indenting
List pgsql-hackers
The error was corrected and a new diff file was created.
The diff file was created based on 16 RC1.
We confirmed that 5 places where errors occurred when performing make check were changed to ok.

Team Query Tricks
---------------------------------------
querytricks2023.gmail.com

2023년 9월 13일 (수) 오후 10:48, Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>님이 작성:
On 12.09.23 09:27, 쿼리트릭스 wrote:
> Thank you for letting me know more about the test method.
> As you said, we applied the patch using git diff and created a test case
> on the src/test/regress/sql.

Because of the change of the psql output, a lot of existing test cases
are now failing.  You should run "make check" and fix up the failures.
Also, your new test file "subpartition_indentation" isn't actually run
because it was not added to src/test/regress/parallel_schedule.  I
suspect you probably don't want to add a new test file for this but
instead see if the existing tests cover this case.

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Geoghegan
Date:
Subject: Re: Optimizing "boundary cases" during backward scan B-Tree index descents
Next
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix error handling in be_tls_open_server()