On 20.03.23 10:40, Sébastien Lardière wrote:
>>> About option_parse_int(), actually, strtoint() is used, do we need a
>>> option_parse_ul() fonction ?
>>
>> For the option parsing, I propose the attached patch. This follows
>> the structure of option_parse_int(), so in the future it could be
>> extracted and refactored in the same way, if there is more need.
>
>
> ok for me, it accept 0x values and refuse wrong values
committed
