On 21/03/2023 08:15, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 20.03.23 10:40, Sébastien Lardière wrote:
>>>> About option_parse_int(), actually, strtoint() is used, do we need
>>>> a option_parse_ul() fonction ?
>>>
>>> For the option parsing, I propose the attached patch. This follows
>>> the structure of option_parse_int(), so in the future it could be
>>> extracted and refactored in the same way, if there is more need.
>>
>>
>> ok for me, it accept 0x values and refuse wrong values
>
> committed
>
thanks,
--
Sébastien
