Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Qingqing Zhou
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update
Date
Msg-id dvg56q$2f6e$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Responses Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
"Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote
>
> What would people like to hear about?
>

I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL. I
can see the MVCC/lock rules there, and basically I can follow them -- but
there are so many if-else in the rules, so the problem always for me is: how
can we gaurantee that the rules are complete and correct? So I guess I may
miss a big picture somewhere.

Regards,
Qingqing




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Luke Lonergan"
Date:
Subject: Re: Automatically setting work_mem
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Automatically setting work_mem