Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update
Date
Msg-id 20060319013431.GC32489@surnet.cl
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update  ("Qingqing Zhou" <zhouqq@cs.toronto.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Qingqing Zhou wrote:

> I am really interested in the concurrency control part of the PostgreSQL. I
> can see the MVCC/lock rules there, and basically I can follow them -- but
> there are so many if-else in the rules, so the problem always for me is: how
> can we gaurantee that the rules are complete and correct? So I guess I may
> miss a big picture somewhere.

Are you talking specifically about the stuff in tqual.c?  If so, I agree
that there doesn't seem to be enough description of how they work, much
less formal proof that they are complete or correct.  I don't know if it
is enough material for a "presentation" though.

-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL Anniversary Proposals -- Important Update
Next
From: Andreas Pflug
Date:
Subject: Re: Automatically setting work_mem