On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 8:25 AM, Juan Pereira
<juankarlos.openggd@gmail.com> wrote:
> Craig Ringer wrote:
>
>
>>> You're almost always better off using a single table with a composite
>>> primary key like (truckid, datapointid) or whatever. If you'll be doing
>>> lots of queries that focus on individual vehicles and expect performance
>>> issues then you could partition the table by truckid, so you actually do
>>> land up with one table per truck, but transparently accessible via table
>>> inheritance so you can still query them all together.
>
> Quite interesting!
>
> The main reason why we thought using a table per truck was because
> concurrent load: if there are 100 trucks trying to write in the same table,
> maybe the performance is worse than having 100 tables, due to the fact that
> the table is blocked for other queries while the writing process is running,
> isn't it?
Using MySQL has a tendency to teach people bad habits, and this
assumption would be one of them. :)
