On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:24 PM, shadrack <shadkeene@hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Mar 2, 5:35 pm, pie...@hogranch.com (John R Pierce) wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>> > shadrack <shadke...@hotmail.com> writes:
>>
>> >> My basic question is...are php4 and postgresql 8.3 compatible?
>> >> I'm running Linux Redhat 3.4.6, php4.3.9, and postgresql 8.3. I know,
>> >> some of those versions are old...its government, and I unfortunately
>> >> don't have control over the version.
>>
>> > Er ... Red Hat *what*? I don't think they ever used such a version
>> > number. If they did it was a very long time ago (for calibration,
>> > they were just about to release RHL 7.3 when I joined the company,
>> > in 2001).
>>
>> well, remember, they went Red Hat Linux 7.x, 8.x, 9 then very quickly
>> switched to Red Hat Enterprise Linux 2, 2.1, 3, 4, and currently RHEL
>> 5. RHEL 3 has had several quarterly updates, most recent of which is
>> u9(I think), sometimes referred to as 3.9.
>>
>> if its RHEL 3 update-something that shadrack is discussing, it came with
>> php 4.3.2 and rh-postgresql 7.3.21 (shudder!)
>>
>> --
>> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-gene...@postgresql.org)
>> To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
>
> Yes, we had postgresql 7.3 but I installed postgresql 8.3 onto the
> rhel3. Do you think its going to work? What's the solution that
> involves the least work, considering I'm not the one maintaining these
> machines? Do you think it would be simple for the IT person to update
> to rhel5 and php5? Its basically just one machine that he would have
> to update. Thoughts? Thanks so much for all the feedback.
> shad
Going straight to RHEL 5 would be a way smarter move. it's stable,
it's supported, and it has php5 and pgsql 8.something as a default
(8.2? Somewhere in there). Plus,. if you want 8.3 you just don't
install 8.2 and instead grab the PGDG rpms from the postgresql ftp
site. I could maybe understand a corporate policy of supporting
RHEL4, but RHEL3 is ancient.
