Re: WAL Log Size - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Scott Marlowe
Subject Re: WAL Log Size
Date
Msg-id dcc563d10802282325g53b5b614s5bbc9cecbf22d9f1@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL Log Size  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 1:08 AM, Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Sam Mason wrote:
>
>  > Just out of interest, why doesn't it do the following?
>  >
>  >  BEGIN;
>  >  create table xlog_switch as
>  >    select '0123456789ABCDE' from generate_series(1,1000000);
>  >  ROLLBACK;
>
>  I'm not 100% sure here what happens when you do the above, and it depends
>  on version, but there are cases where creating a new or empty table in a
>  transaction is optimized to not create any WAL as a performance
>  improvement.  This has become a common idiom for that reason:

That's why the create table statement up there had the from
generate_series bit...

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Greg Smith
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Log Size
Next
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: Text Search zero padding