Re: WAL Log Size - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Greg Smith
Subject Re: WAL Log Size
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.64.0802290200230.2395@westnet.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: WAL Log Size  (Sam Mason <sam@samason.me.uk>)
Responses Re: WAL Log Size  ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Fri, 29 Feb 2008, Sam Mason wrote:

> Just out of interest, why doesn't it do the following?
>
>  BEGIN;
>  create table xlog_switch as
>    select '0123456789ABCDE' from generate_series(1,1000000);
>  ROLLBACK;

I'm not 100% sure here what happens when you do the above, and it depends
on version, but there are cases where creating a new or empty table in a
transaction is optimized to not create any WAL as a performance
improvement.  This has become a common idiom for that reason:

BEGIN;
truncate table t;
copy t from '/fdsa/fds/afds.csv' with csv;
COMMIT;

To take advantage of this loading without WAL feature.

I wish I had more details here, never have found a more formal definition
of how this works than suggestions on the list.

--
* Greg Smith gsmith@gregsmith.com http://www.gregsmith.com Baltimore, MD

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Klint Gore
Date:
Subject: Re: rule question
Next
From: "Scott Marlowe"
Date:
Subject: Re: WAL Log Size