On Nov 9, 2007 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> "Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> writes:
> > On Nov 9, 2007 5:14 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> >> [ thinks for a bit... ] It might be possible to get rid of the keyword
> >> and have RETURN QUERY be recognized by an ad-hoc strcmp test, much like
> >> the various direction keywords in FETCH have been handled without making
> >> them real keywords. It'd be a bit uglier but it'd avoid making QUERY
> >> be effectively a reserved word.
>
> > It's not uncommon to have auditing triggers store things in tables
> > with fields named query in them. I know I have a few places that do
> > this...
>
> It turned out to be a very easy change, so it's done: QUERY isn't a
> reserved word anymore.
Thanks!
