On 2023-09-25 18:49, Andrey Lepikhov wrote:
> On 25/9/2023 14:21, torikoshia wrote:
>> On 2023-09-20 14:39, Lepikhov Andrei wrote:
>> Hmm, as a test, I made sure to call ProcessLogQueryPlanInterrupt() on
>> all CFI using
>> v28-0002-Testing-attempt-logging-plan-on-ever-CFI-call.patch, and then
>> ran the following query but did not cause any problems.
>>
>> ```
>> =# CREATE TABLE test();
>> =# CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION ddl() RETURNS void AS $$
>> BEGIN
>> EXECUTE format('ALTER TABLE test ADD COLUMN x integer;');
>> PERFORM pg_sleep(5);
>> END; $$ LANGUAGE plpgsql VOLATILE;
>> =# SELECT ddl();
>> ```
>>
>> Is this the case you're worrying about?
>
> I didn't find a problem either. I just feel uncomfortable if, at the
> moment of interruption, we have a descriptor of another query than the
> query have been executing and holding resources.
I think that "descriptor" here refers to ActiveQueryDesc, in which case
it is updated at the beginning of ExecutorRun(), so I am wondering if
the situation you're worried about would not occur.
---------
@@ -303,10 +306,21 @@ ExecutorRun(QueryDesc *queryDesc,
ScanDirection direction, uint64 count,
bool execute_once)
{
+ /*
+ * Update ActiveQueryDesc here to enable retrieval of the currently
+ * running queryDesc for nested queries.
+ */
+ QueryDesc *save_ActiveQueryDesc;
+
+ save_ActiveQueryDesc = ActiveQueryDesc;
+ ActiveQueryDesc = queryDesc;
---------
--
Regards,
--
Atsushi Torikoshi
NTT DATA Group Corporation