Re: Flaky vacuum truncate test in reloptions.sql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Arseny Sher
Subject Re: Flaky vacuum truncate test in reloptions.sql
Date
Msg-id d5dd7eaf-0ba1-a18b-1ef2-552196f36a71@postgrespro.ru
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Flaky vacuum truncate test in reloptions.sql  (Masahiko Sawada <sawada.mshk@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Flaky vacuum truncate test in reloptions.sql
List pgsql-hackers
On 3/31/21 4:17 PM, Masahiko Sawada wrote:

 > Is it better to add FREEZE to the first "VACUUM reloptions_test;" as 
well?

I don't think this matters much, as it tests the contrary and the 
probability of
successful test passing (in case of theoretical bug making vacuum to 
truncate
non-empty relation) becomes stunningly small. But adding it wouldn't hurt
either.

-- cheers, arseny



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: invalid data in file backup_label problem on windows
Next
From: Markus Wanner
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] add concurrent_abort callback for output plugin