On 31.03.21 15:18, Amit Kapila wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 31, 2021 at 11:55 AM Markus Wanner
>> The last sentences there now seems to relate to just the setting of
>> "concurrent_abort", rather than the whole reason to invoke the
>> prepare_cb. And the reference to the "gid" is a bit lost. Maybe:
>>
>> "Thus even in case of a concurrent abort, enough information is
>> provided to the output plugin for it to properly deal with the
>> <command>ROLLBACK PREPARED</command> once that is decoded."
>
> Okay, Changed the patch accordingly.
That's fine with me. I didn't necessarily mean to eliminate the hint to
the concurrent_abort field, but it's more concise that way. Thank you.
Regards
Markus