Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gilles Darold
Subject Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Date
Msg-id d4797c4a-5598-d03b-4c47-f9ef709a1022@migops.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column  (Dave Cramer <davecramer@postgres.rocks>)
Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column  (Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Le 15/10/2021 à 14:24, Aleksander Alekseev a écrit :
> Hi Gilles,
>
>> If we really want SELECT * to be reserved to DBA then why not removing the
>> star from PG unless you have the admin privilege?
> Respectfully, I perceive this as a trolling (presumably, non-intentional one)
> and not going to answer this.


Yes, I don't wanted to offend you or to troll. This was just to point 
that the position of "SELECT * is bad practice" is not a good argument 
in my point of view, just because it is allowed for every one. I mean 
that in an extension or a client which allow user query input we must 
handle the case.


-- 
Gilles Darold




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alexander Pyhalov
Date:
Subject: Partial aggregates pushdown
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column