Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Aleksander Alekseev
Subject Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
Date
Msg-id CAJ7c6TNxyAoYo5+F+eXf95mNi4ZzBeGKLjCnfYJcCe7fk2Q-YQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column  (Laurenz Albe <laurenz.albe@cybertec.at>)
Responses Re: [PATCH] Proposal for HIDDEN/INVISIBLE column
List pgsql-hackers
Hi Gilles,

> But we have more and more application coming from others RDBMS with sometime
> no real possibility to modify the code or which requires lot of work.

Somehow I feel everyone here very well understood the real motivation
behind this
proposal from the beginning, considering the e-mail of the author. And came to
his or her own conclusions.

> If we really want SELECT * to be reserved to DBA then why not removing the
> star from PG unless you have the admin privilege?

Respectfully, I perceive this as a trolling (presumably, non-intentional one)
and not going to answer this.

-- 
Best regards,
Aleksander Alekseev



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: refactoring basebackup.c
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: should we allow users with a predefined role to access pg_backend_memory_contexts view and pg_log_backend_memory_contexts function?