Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

On 16/08/2024 21:01, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 1:44 PM Jacob Champion
> <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>>      https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2/blob/658afe4cd90d3e167d7c98d22824a8d6ec895b1c/tests/test_async.py#L89
>>      https://github.com/infusion/PHP/blob/7ebefb6426bb4b4820a30cca5c3a10bfd757b6ea/ext/pgsql/pgsql.c#L864
> 
> IMHO these examples establish beyond doubt that the existing function
> really is being used in ways that would break if we committed the
> proposed patch. To be honest, I'm slightly surprised, because protocol
> version 2 has been so dead for so long that I would not have
> anticipated people would even bother checking for it. But these
> examples show that some people do. If Jacob found these examples this
> easily, there are probably a bunch of others.
> 
> It's not worth breaking existing code to avoid adding one new libpq
> entrypoint. Let's just add the new function and move on.

+1. Jacob is right.

-- 
Heikki Linnakangas
Neon (https://neon.tech)