On 16/08/2024 21:01, Robert Haas wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2024 at 1:44 PM Jacob Champion > <jacob.champion@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2/blob/658afe4cd90d3e167d7c98d22824a8d6ec895b1c/tests/test_async.py#L89 >> https://github.com/infusion/PHP/blob/7ebefb6426bb4b4820a30cca5c3a10bfd757b6ea/ext/pgsql/pgsql.c#L864 > > IMHO these examples establish beyond doubt that the existing function > really is being used in ways that would break if we committed the > proposed patch. To be honest, I'm slightly surprised, because protocol > version 2 has been so dead for so long that I would not have > anticipated people would even bother checking for it. But these > examples show that some people do. If Jacob found these examples this > easily, there are probably a bunch of others. > > It's not worth breaking existing code to avoid adding one new libpq > entrypoint. Let's just add the new function and move on. +1. Jacob is right.
pgsql-hackers by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных