Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER
Date
Msg-id cf349b4e-aa59-46af-a3ec-73157cb37116@eisentraut.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER  (Jacob Champion <pchampion@vmware.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 08.02.25 02:56, Jacob Champion wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 12:12 PM Daniel Gustafsson<daniel@yesql.se> wrote:
>> Is it really enough to do this at build time?  A very small percentage of users
>> running this will also be building their own libpq so the warning is lost on
>> them.  That being said, I'm not entirely sure what else we could do (bleeping a
>> warning every time is clearly not userfriendly) so maybe this is a TODO in the
>> code?
> I've added a TODO back. At the moment, I don't have any good ideas; if
> the user isn't building libpq, they're not going to be able to take
> action on the warning anyway, and for many use cases they're probably
> not going to care.

This just depends on how people have built their libcurl, right?

Do we have any information whether the async-dns-free build is a common 
configuration?




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
Next
From: Matthias van de Meent
Date:
Subject: Re: Parallel CREATE INDEX for GIN indexes