Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andres Freund
Subject Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
Date
Msg-id smyneb4dfp7mgf2g5dluee4jht26t474mxx5cs72dtybmjox3h@gfnzxo22mp6x
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI  (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>)
Responses Re: Adding NetBSD and OpenBSD to Postgres CI
List pgsql-hackers
Hi,

I finally pushed this. The meson fix backpatched to 16.

I did some very minor polishing, reordering the OS lists to stay alphabetical,
instead of adding netbsd/openbsd somewhere to the front of lists.

Thanks for the patches!


Obviously not your fault, but I do think it's pretty crazy that with the same
available resources, netbsd and openbsd take considerably longer than linux
and freebsd, which both do a lot more (linux tests 32 and 64 bit with ubsan
with autoconf and asan with meson, freebsd tests a bunch of debugging
options).  I wonder what is going wrong.  I suspect we might be waiting for
the filesystem a lot, according to cirrus-ci's CPU usage graph we're not CPU
bound during the test phase.  Or maybe they just scale badly.



Any chance you're interested in rebasing and expanding
https://postgr.es/m/20240413021221.hg53rvqlvldqh57i%40awork3.anarazel.de

It'd be nice if we could enable these tasks on cfbot, where we bring our own
compute, while leaving them on manual for everyone else.

Greetings,

Andres Freund



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PoC] Federated Authn/z with OAUTHBEARER