On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 21:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > It is not the role that is modified. Perhaps:
> >
> > [...]; if omitted, the current role is used.
>
> Sure, attached. Here is the issue I have though, we are really not
> changing default privileges for objects created in the future, we are
> changing the role _now_ so future objects will have different default
> privileges, right? I think wording like the above is kind of odd.
I see what you mean. The alternative is to be precise, at the risk of
repeating ourselves:
if omitted, default privileges will be changed for objects created by
the current role.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
