On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 09:44:14AM +0100, Laurenz Albe wrote:
> On Sat, 2023-11-04 at 21:14 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > > It is not the role that is modified. Perhaps:
> > >
> > > [...]; if omitted, the current role is used.
> >
> > Sure, attached. Here is the issue I have though, we are really not
> > changing default privileges for objects created in the future, we are
> > changing the role _now_ so future objects will have different default
> > privileges, right? I think wording like the above is kind of odd.
>
> I see what you mean. The alternative is to be precise, at the risk of
> repeating ourselves:
>
> if omitted, default privileges will be changed for objects created by
> the current role.
Okay, I think I have good wording for this. I didn't like the wording
of other roles, so I restructured that in the attached patch too.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EDB https://enterprisedb.com
Only you can decide what is important to you.
