Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Jeff Davis
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id ce5af05900fdbd0e9185747825a7423c48501964.camel@j-davis.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, 2020-09-14 at 20:48 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> > Sure. Will backporting either patch into REL_13_STABLE now
> > interfere
> > with RC1 release in any way?
> 
> The RMT will discuss this.
> 
> It would help if there was a patch ready to go.

Attached. HashAgg seems to accurately reflect the filesize, as does
Sort.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis
Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Paquier
Date:
Subject: Re: tab completion of IMPORT FOREIGN SCHEMA
Next
From: Masahiro Ikeda
Date:
Subject: Re: New statistics for tuning WAL buffer size