Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzkHhaANmvcnyPzQnEqQNbrjU8bAMtkHhJs8v6RJokwvTg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 11:44 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> Attached. HashAgg seems to accurately reflect the filesize, as does
> Sort.

For the avoidance of doubt: I think that this is the right way to go,
and that it should be committed shortly, before we stamp 13.0. The
same goes for hashagg-release-write-buffers.patch.

Thanks
-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft