Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmU1K3Vt_TGg2MLPSzwKCMmsOoNg0730OXxY=HDuDOMrg@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Responses Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>)
Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> Sure. Will backporting either patch into REL_13_STABLE now interfere
> with RC1 release in any way?

The RMT will discuss this.

It would help if there was a patch ready to go.

Thanks
-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Gripes about walsender command processing
Next
From: Li Japin
Date:
Subject: Parallelize stream replication process