Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Geoghegan
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id CAH2-WzmtQ+f+iPjy5GAqGJk0KJ8Xc9oQRkd6Xe9AJ8PuaA76XQ@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:48 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
> > Sure. Will backporting either patch into REL_13_STABLE now interfere
> > with RC1 release in any way?
>
> The RMT will discuss this.

It is okay to skip RC1 and commit the patch/patches for 13 itself.
Please wait until after Tom has pushed the rc1 tag. This will probably
happen tomorrow.

-- 
Peter Geoghegan

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft