Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers
Date
Msg-id 1306234.1600186123@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>)
Responses Re: logtape.c stats don't account for unused "prefetched" block numbers  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:48 PM Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 8:07 PM Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com> wrote:
>>> Sure. Will backporting either patch into REL_13_STABLE now interfere
>>> with RC1 release in any way?

> It is okay to skip RC1 and commit the patch/patches for 13 itself.
> Please wait until after Tom has pushed the rc1 tag. This will probably
> happen tomorrow.

I plan to tag rc1 in around six hours, ~2200UTC today, barring
trouble reports from packagers (none so far).  Feel free to push your
patch once the tag appears.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: PG 13 release notes, first draft
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: PostgreSQL 13 RC 1 release announcement draft