On Wed, 2022-09-07 at 15:44 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> This certainly vindicates Tom's decision to backpatch his fix for the
> heap_update() issue. Clearly this new variant bug can't have anything
> to do
> with the 14-era behavioral change to lazy_vacuum_heap_page() from
> commit 8523492d4e. That behavioral change was clearly a factor in the
> heap_update() issue, but can't be relevant here. Since the repro we
> have
> shows that 13 is also affected.
I wasn't able to repro on 13, but Robins' report indicates that it's
possible.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
