Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option
Date
Msg-id c9d2c989-3ee7-f371-c72f-e1b389738a00@2ndQuadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
Responses Re: pg_dumpall --exclude-database option  (Fabien COELHO <coelho@cri.ensmp.fr>)
List pgsql-hackers

On 10/31/2018 12:44 PM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> Hello Andrew,
>
>> This patch addresses all these concerns.
>
> Patch v4 applies cleanly, compiles, doc generation ok, global & local 
> tests ok.
>
> Tiny comments: there is a useless added blank line at the beginning of 
> the added varlistenry.
>
> I have recreated the CF entry and put the patch to ready... but I've 
> must have mixed up something because now there are two entries:-(
>
> Could anywone remove the duplicate entry (1859 & 1860 are the same)? 
> Peter??
>


:-( My fault, I just created a new one.

cheers

andrew

-- 
Andrew Dunstan                https://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Next
From: Robert Haas
Date:
Subject: Re: pg_promote not marked as parallel-restricted in pg_proc.dat