On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 12:47 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
>
> I don't feel as strongly as others apparently do on this point
> though,
> and I'd rather have non-superusers able to run CHECKPOINT *somehow*
> than not, so if the others feel like a predefined role is a better
> approach then I'm alright with that. Seems a bit overkill to me but
> it's also not like it's actually all that much code or work to do.
+1. It seems like the pg_checkpointer predefined role is the most
acceptable to everyone (even if not universally liked).
Attached a rebased version of that patch.
Regards,
Jeff Davis
