On Fri, 2020-03-13 at 09:10 +1300, David Rowley wrote:
> So you're suggesting we drive the insert-vacuums from existing
> scale_factor and threshold? What about the 1 billion row table
> example above?
I am still not 100% certain if that is really realistic.
Transactions that insert only a single row are probably the
exception in large insert-only tables.
But I think that we probably always can find a case where any given
parameter setting is not so great, so in order to get ahead
let's decide on something that is not right out stupid.
Changing the defaults later is always an option.
So the three options are:
1. introduce no new parameters and trigger autovacuum if the number
of inserts exceeds the regular vacuum threshold.
2. introduce the new parameters with high base threshold and zero scale factor.
3. introduce the new parameters with low base threshold and high scale factor.
I think all three are viable.
If nobody else wants to weigh in, throw a coin.
Yours,
Laurenz Albe
