On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:50:17PM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Thanks, looks good. I don't think we *need* the MAXPGPATH restriction
> really -- I was thinking in a StringInfo kind of approach where you just
> append the stuff you need without having to think about the buffer
> length.
Oh, OK. I missed your point then. No problem with that by doing it
as the attached. There is one small trick because of
make_native_path() though.
> Aha, good. I would still put the new "archive.c" entry on its own line,
> and just keep the other two lines unchanged. (That preserves the
> perhaps non-obvious property that all entries that start with the same
> letter are in the same line.)
No issues with that either. Are you fine with the updated version
attached for 0001?
--
Michael
